Thursday post

Very early in the debate today , I knew who the winner would be. Bill Nye does a great job of explaining how evolution is something viable to the charming northern Kentucky crowed. I particularly liked the bit where he clarifies that there are millions of people out there who practice religion that do not refute evolution and assume that scientific studies are always run by a horde of militant atheists. I think perhaps there could have been a better argue for creationism as Ham's antics are juvenile from the beginning , usually boiling down to :"look at this scientist , he believes in creationism. There are dozens of us!"   By contrast, Bill Nye's counterpoints were usually concise and on topic. Having seen the whole debate , it only gets worse for Mr. Ham and I am eager to see how Mr. Nye refutes Ham's preposterous claims.