Today's class consisted of us watching the debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham again. I still hold true to the fact that Darwin's theory is the one that best explains evolution. Therefore, I agree with Bill Nye. Bill Nye then began to support this theory with various scientific facts. The one that was most interesting to me was the one concerning the tree. With this example, Bill Nye destroyed Ken Ham. Nye stated that the earth has not even been around as long as religious elements would claim. This, therefore, explains why Darwin's theory is most valid since Bible stories like Adam and Eve and Noah's Ark claim that the earth has been around for much longer than it actually has which would present a faulty evolution theory.
Overall, Bill Nye sides with the facts while Ham sides with the make believe. Ham's side has not been proven while Nye's side has been through research and study. I may be a little biased since I am not very religious so I obviously would not agree with Ham's argument since it concerns religious history. This religious belief of mine provided for an interesting viewing experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment