The
debate we saw is class today featured Bill Nye and Ken Ham. This debate is
tricky because the history of our existence cannot be proven 100%. However,
some theories are better than others. In my opinion Naturalism is the most
logical based on its ideals and evidence backing it up. For me, when someone
believes that the whole world was flooded and two of each animal boarded a
wooden ship with a guy named Noah AND survived, his or her argument is
automatically invalid in my book. However, I have always wanted to see this
kind of debate before, just to see what each side has to defend itself. For
today’s segment, Ham had his time to shine; yet he didn’t. I found myself
getting frustrated with his argument because he kept reiterating the same
information and kept stating that whether or not you believe in God you can
still make scientific discoveries (#nosh*t). Anyways, Ken Ham seems like a nice
guy, but I’m not a fan.
No comments:
Post a Comment