In
today's reading, I noticed two major ideas that Dostoyevsky brought up. The
first is mental recreation of a past even. For when the mouse goes into hiding
it recreates all the "its injury down to the smallest, most ignominious
details"; however, it begins to fill in details that were forgotten. In
fact, we study this in memory psychology. Human's do not like to have a hole in
our memory so we fill it in with an available memory. But the face is that the
memory is often recreated improperly. Dostoyevsky talks about the filled in
memory causing us to brew up desire for revenge. He says that we sleep and
think all day about it. In fact this idea perfectly explains the behaviors of
the narrator in part two when he is walking on the side walk. The next idea that
Dostoyevsky talks about is again about the wall. He says that scientist show us
that "one pound of our own fat must be dearer to you than a hundred
thousand of your fellow-creatures", which explains why selfishness is a
necessary evolutionary trait. However, we must refuse science because to
believe in science to believe again in another wall. But I strongly disagree
with this argument. For what if science holds the correct answer. Mr. Shapiro
you say that it can not hold the right answer, yet it science (this man made
thing) works. Science creates the phones that we use, the cars that we drive,
the computers that we use, the internet that we communicate on. How could
something that works so properly in the real world be wrong? Science is man
made but the laws of nature which science tries to explain is not. Science
properly explains these laws; therefore, it should be accepted. I do believe
that there is no end to infinity, yet there are conclusions that can be drawn
from infinity, you can not refute that. So 2+2=4 and an object of mass 1kg
being acted on by a 4N force will accelerate at 4m/s. You can say that 2+2=5
only if your five has a value of my four (so therefore you are only arguing
that language is man made), you can say that a meter is man made yet it defined
as the distance light travels in 1/299,792,458 seconds (and a second is "defined as the duration
of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition
between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom." (wikipedia))
therefore it is truly based on nature!
No comments:
Post a Comment