How much do you like this book?

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Ryan C Discussion Post #2


      The first paragraph discussed today in class further showed that Dostoyevsky presents both sides of every argument and flips what the reader believes, he does so by going back and forth whether or not the narrator is in fact a spiteful person. The idea that religion was a necessary byproduct of human evolution is quite complex. Religion was needed to protect humans from other humans, which is rational argument, however, although religion has outlasted its original purpose, it is still somewhat needed in society. Going back to the lecture on The Stranger, there can only be rich people because there are poor people. Religion is necessary to ensure social class distinction; it is the opiate of the masses. Today religion ensures that the people at the bottom of society stay at the bottom with the hope of a greater reward. Mr. Shapiro made a point that I thought was true, he said that religion cannot suppress thousands of years of human instincts, a thought that is particularly prudent evident since world history is plagued by wars in the name of religion.

No comments:

Post a Comment